Interview with Robert Traynham (Part 2 of 3)

This is the second part of my three part interview with Robert Traynham – Washington, D.C. Bureau Chief and Host, “Roll Call TV with Robert Traynham” – CN8, The Comcast Network. Part 1 appeared in August. These questions pertain to the Democratic National Convention.


There were several caucus meetings, Hispanic caucus, women’s caucus, etc., at the convention. Do these meetings serve any real purpose or accomplish anything other than a venue for networking?

I think first and foremost these caucus meetings serve as a venue for networking. I stopped by a couple of caucus breakfasts where you can break bread with people you haven’t met before, get to know one another, discuss strengths of the candidates and campaigns and brainstorm future initiatives. Especially when the caucuses are topical—for example, the women’s caucus was very relevant due to the Hillary-to-Obama shift. That being said, networking at caucus meetings does prove to be fruitful when it comes to the general election in the fall.

Did you hear any interesting rumors about or plans for people to run for Senate in 2010 against Arlen Specter or statewide or national offices in Pennsylvania?

I did. But they’re only rumors, so I wouldn’t feel comfortable commenting on them at this time. It’s to be determined!

Were you surprised, pleasantly or otherwise, by any of the speeches made at the convention?

I was surprised by how articulate and poised Michelle Obama was delivering her speech at the Convention. She was very comfortable speaking to the national audience about her husband and his accomplishments, and she exceeded my highest expectations.

What percentage of delegates attending the convention actually sit through several hours of speeches from the podium every evening?

I would say probably a little less than half. Conventions are highly-orchestrated with a large number of parties and networking events where attendees get to know each other. Convention speeches really are for the people at home, rather than those in the halls.

Is there really a significant number of Hillary Clinton supporters who are considering not voting or voting Republican?

Not sure if the word significant is accurate, but there are some that clearly are opposed to voting for Obama and are considering voting for McCain in November. Now that Palin is on the Republican ticket, it gives them an additional reason to think seriously about voting for McCain.

My thanks to Robert Traynham. I look forward to the third part of the interview.